After-Action Report
Tbilisi, Georgia, 17-19 May 2011
This workshop was organized by the US Department of Defense (US European Command, Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center, Center for Disaster and Humanitarian Assistance Medicine, and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency) and the US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) with the support of the National Center for Disease Control and Public Health of Georgia (NCDC), the US-Georgia Central Public Health Reference Laboratory (CPHRL), and the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia. It included awareness training, a tabletop exercise designed to review the technical guidelines and procedures associated with the United Nations Secretary General’s Mechanism on Investigation of Alleged Use of Biological and Chemical Weapons (UNSGM), and a practical demonstration of consequence management capabilities of Georgia’s Ministry of Internal Affairs CBRN Rapid Response Team…
- Author:
- Department of Defense (US European Command, Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center, Center for Disaster and Humanitarian Assistance Medicine, and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency) and the US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) with the support of the National Center for Disease Control and Public Health of Georgia (NCDC), the US-Georgia Central Public Health Reference Laboratory (CPHRL), and the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia
- Publish Date:
- May 2011
Presidential Directive
Homeland Security Presidential Directive 9 (HSPD-9)
Signed: January 30, 2004
Defense of United States Agriculture and Food “establishes a national policy to defend the agriculture and food system against terrorist attacks, major disasters, and other emergencies.” Fulfilling the policy requires recognition of important agriculture and food infrastructure and ensuring their protection; development of mechanisms that provide early warning to threats; reduction of weaknesses during production and processing; enhancement of both product screening procedures; and response and recovery.
Cures that Kill: Biosecurity and the Dual-Use Dilemma
China represents a key player in biosecurity negotiations, as it has been both the victim of one of the worst biowarfare campaigns of the 20th century, at the hands of the Japanese, and has been a source of numerous emerging and re-emerging diseases, SARS and H5N1 being the best known. Of equal importance to China’s role as an international biosecurity actor is the burgeoning growth of its life science and biotechnology industries. This paper contains observations from an ongoing study into biosecurity in China. It is based on interviews and discussions in Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou with life scientists and policy makers in infectious disease hospitals, district level Centers for Disease Control (CDC) offices, university research labs, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Ministry of Health.”
By Michael Barr
View Document